Universal Language is MUSIC

Music is a universal phenomenon.it doesn't have any boundary or region.music can express each and every human emotion or may be more.music helps to connect with animals too.

Some detail about Nepal

As left wing principles were believed in, not to be ashamed of, and kept alive. Able to impose socialist ways, freedom, and liberty, and a better society, and catch up with India, but remain a free society. Brilliant. Often foreign states support the autocratic rightist regime, even the US, to support it's trade interests, not caring about froegners, sometimes not, For a change Britain gave support top teh democarts, as did India, even verging on sacrficing a ally Nepal, aionto being a ally of China, which became the major backer of Nepal's royals, while Pakistan was unable, to even if it wanted as found it so hard, But the India, - British alliance, saw even the British ambassador condemn the royal coup, just like they should, I mean maybe be friends even with dictatorships that are old, to encourage world peace, but condemning them is good and often better like they sometimes do over Burma, and do over some lands. Sometimes right wingers are the ambassador, like in Saudi Arabia, where the ambassador said Riyadh after some terrorist killings of Brits is safer than the most crime ridden British city, more like he is the British ambassador in Saudi Arabia, against tourism, in Britain rather than ambassador for British values, and peace. Anyhow, some are good, and some are bad. differnet people at different times. But anyhow some US support for the democracy movement, so it all also worked.

Some detail about Nepal

But the Maoist revolt increased it's strength, the revolt started in 1995 then upped in 1996. To 2001 it took rural areas, and had its own courts, Then 3000 died in 1996-2002 in this. There was a royal coup in 2001, to fight the Maoists, claiming politicians had failed, they gave power back for a while then took it again seemingly for ever, from, early 2005, Propaganda from royalists claimed democracy had failed, But by late 2005, the war still upped, 11,000 had died, and by now as of the massacres by Maoists in 100s, the Royal army killed far more, massacring 1000s. The Royalists became able to be seen as as bad the Maoists if not worse especially after torture and arresting of over 3000 dissidents and their labeling of human rightists activists as terrifying names, even ones fighting child labour, and politicians, and corrupt, When their kings were very rich and far richer. It was shown the honeymoon, of this royal coup failed, and support drained, away as the war carried on, Small scale Congress marches of 1000s, increased and increased more, when the Royalists refused to have a peace deal with the Maoists, then Congress a party which and the non rebellion Communists said they would make a deal with the Maoists, It was now seen that holiday making had plummeted massively since the royal coup of 2005, that people, were being arrested just for their views, and things they had said in the past, that the army was being more unfair, sand still committing massacres. So the royals were seen as worse than the not many deaths they could be held responsible for democrats, the less murders than Royalists Maoists, so the Royalists and their terrifying high minded attitude to others (I saw on the Internet ) could be seen as extreme, and the most murderous and least pro peace, The royalists were prepared to ally to anybody China, India, or Pakistan, just to stay in power, While the democrats were more allied to democratic India, a land, more linked in trade to Nepal. China wanted to set up roads, but this was very difficult so that it could support the royal dictatorships like how it supported Pol Pot and the king of Cambodia, in their brutal late 1970s regime. I helped say on the Internet condemn the king, do not say it is just his advisors, oppose him

Some detail about Nepal

In 1989 the Communists and Congress, helped oust the Royal partyless dictatorial version of democracy,. and democracy started. But the king kept allot of power. The new system, started on the economic liberalization of many lands. The fact was that in most lands economic liberalisation was bad for the lower classes, most people, you know like South America, where it saw welfare, and subsidies cut, so seeing private companies and privatisation benefit the rich. But Nepal, was so poor, that economic liberalisation, did not see much state cuts. Whereas experts from IMF or whatever were able to sell South America and lands, cut this welfare cash, and state investment, in social services, Nepal's royalist elite had not seen helping the peasants as any use to their rich money grubbing, some wanted good for their people, but most wanted stuff for themselves. So privatisation did not see much bad, as their was little to privatise, so actually amazingly social services improved in Nepal, and life. But this was not good enough for many Nepalis, for a country still with more serfs and slaves, and child labourers than India per head at the time, poorer and with a lower life expectancy where 100s still did in famines, this seemed pointless, So democracy was not bringing in enough for them. Revolutionary Maoists started a small scale rebellion in areas of ethnic minorities usually in the west. The ruling Congress, and Communist and every so often royalists coalition had interference from the king, but unstable regimes, they were unable to crack down on the Maoist revolt, By the end of the decade there had been low thousands of deaths, The tactics of the Maoists were to take over areas and every so often attack state police and such. In the 1990s, welfare improved.

 

Some detail about Nepal

The land remained a land of Mountains, to the 1900s, and holding a broad range of inequality from rich concubine holding princes, too child labourers, but also many comfortably off urban servants, and poverty, and also a majority of the population being peasants farming. across the foothills and valleys below the Himalayas, and also Sherpas, and lots of Hindus and Buddhists and some Muslims, and Christians, split into many ethnicities. In 1923 Nepal was approved independence by Britain, but remained a strong ally of Britain it had sent many troops to help Britain in World War One, which helped spread flu back to Nepal. Nepal saw it's autocratic regime, end slavery under British interference, but the regime kept Nepal, in poverty, and did not develop much. In the 1930s, some died, and were arrested in small rebellions. Which included just forming rival religious groups. This continued in the 1940s, when Congress got stronger and helped oust the monarchy of then, India helped the democracy movement get a new king, who had less concubine ways, But the kings used their power to attack the democracy movements, small revolts and riots shone through seeing some deaths. By 1959 the kings deposed the Nepali Congress influenced regimes, this was as the kings wanted power, they claimed there was corruption in the Congress party but if there was it was no worse than the rampant high pay to the king and his supporters, and massive control his fellows had. This stayed across the decades. In the 1970s there was a small Maoist revolt of some deaths. not many that was beaten. Since 1945 and India's democracy, Nepal had fallen behind India in GDP per capita, despite India's difficulties, and had fallen behind in life expectancy. In 1980, more democracy was brought in after protests, deaths would occur in riots with political campaigners, campaigning, so that the state would be a democracy for the people, rather than for the king and his family.



 

Some detail about Nepal

The Rana dynasty of Rajputs ruled the Kingdom of Nepal from 1846 until 1953, reducing the Shah monarch to a figurehead and making Prime Minister and other government positions hereditary. It is descended from one Bal Narsingh Kunwar of Kaski, who moved to Gorkha in the early 18th century and entered the service of Raja Nara Bhupal Shah around 1740. Originally, the Rana dynasty hails from the Sisodiya Rajput Royal family of Chittor now Udaipur in India, capital of the Mewar region. The dynasty traces its roots to Maharaj Kumbhakaran Singh of Chittor, Mewar. Maharaj Kumbhakaran Singh was the younger brother of Rana Ratan Singh of Mewar. Rana Ratan Singh married Rani Padmini (She along with hundreds of other women undertook Jauhar and the male members performed Saka during the siege of the Chittorgarh fort by the ignominious sultan of Delhi, Allauddin Khilji ). Unlike claimed ancestral root to Chittor, per se Dor Bahadur Bista, a notable anthropologist,brought to light that the ancestors of Ranas were Jumli Khadka who joined the army of Kaski principalities whom king of kaski honored with the title of Kunwar. Kunwar became Rana only after the time of Jung Bahadur Rana. In some historical evidences, King Surendra has referred Junga as a lowly Khas. To accept the marriage proposal of Jung's son's with the King Surendra's daughter, it is said that clever Jung linked his ancestral root to Chittor Rajput to be superior to khas and equivalent to Shahs.

Some detail about Nepal

The modern history of Nepal starts with the establishment of the Gorkha kingdom by Prithvi Narayan Shah in the 18th century. From 1765 the Gorkha king started unifying all the lands and states and ethnicities of Nepal, and it's varied land, split into mountains, and of Hindu and Buddhist majority areas, into modern Nepal. He was largely successful in his attempts of invasion. He annexed a large area of Bhutan and Tibet. His designs were later put to action by his successors. Their attempts hit a roadblock at the advent of the 19th century. The British East India Company got apprehensive of their maneuvers and took them head on. The kingdom was soundly humiliated and routed in the Anglo-Nepalese war of 1816. They had to agree to some of the very insulting terms, on the negotiation table. They conceded the entire Gadhwal and Kumaon region to the British India. In the same decade, Jung Bahadur, one of the valiant generals of Shahs tried to topple the regime. The queen met the efforts with the bloody counter initiatives.